
Everybody knows that the 2008 world financial crisis has had a very high impact on the car industry.
The American big three (GM, Ford and Chrysler) had to go through incredible difficult times. The first one was saved by the US government and abandoned famous brand names such as Hummer and Saturn.
Ford decided to sell several division to find enough money to save itself and Chrysler forged an alliance with the Italian group FIAT (or should we talk about a take over).
I never owned a Saab but it is with sorrow that I learned the end of its famous story. There are very few car brands originated from small countries left on the market.
What is interesting is to see how the Saab case is an example of why mergers and takeovers can be bad experiences. Before being bought by Ford, Saab made cool, idiosyncratic cars. Different cars compared to the competitors. Not only they were safe, solid, spacious, and ergonomic and enjoyed an image very different from BMW, Mercedes or Volvo.
Often, the SAAB drivers were doctors, architects, and university professors: nice and smart people. GM was simply unable to capitalize on these competitive advantages.
The first decision they took in Detroit was to base the 1990 new SAAB on the 1980 Opel Vectra! After that they stopped to update the car. In fact, GM did the contrary of what VAG group did by hauling AUDI out from the VW’s shadow. The smart SAAB drivers became slowly but surely AUDI drivers.
When finally GM understood the mistake, the SAAB 9-5 was 13 years old. The new 9-X was announced and is still not there. Good and nice concepts were worked out at the Ford-SAAB design centre, but in the meantime the Ford pockets were already empty.
For most of people around the world: Sweden rimes with design and just add to that, the fact that Saab’s Swedish origin had given to the brand a « green halo effect ». Strong points for a 21st century brand name!
————————————–
©-2010 Marketing Automotive – Bernhard Adriaensens – International Consultant in Automotive Marketing and Management